What Are The Implications Of Using A Barrel Shifter Instead Of A Multiplier-accumulator (MAC) For Implementing The Galois Field Multiplication In A Cryptographic Coprocessor, Specifically In Terms Of Area Efficiency, Timing Closure, And Resistance To Side-channel Attacks, Assuming A 32-bit RISC-V Core Running At 100 MHz With A 128-bit AES Encryption Block Size?
In evaluating the use of a Barrel Shifter versus a multiplier-accumulator (MAC) for Galois Field multiplication in a cryptographic coprocessor, several key factors emerge:
-
Area Efficiency: Barrel Shifters are more area-efficient due to their simpler circuitry, which is beneficial in embedded systems where silicon area is constrained. MACs require more complex circuitry, increasing their area footprint.
-
Timing Closure: Barrel Shifters are advantageous as they can perform shifts in a single clock cycle, simplifying timing closure and supporting higher clock speeds, such as 100 MHz. MACs may introduce longer critical paths, potentially complicating timing closure.
-
Resistance to Side-Channel Attacks: Barrel Shifters offer more predictable timing and consistent power consumption, enhancing resistance to side-channel attacks. MACs, with more complex operations, may exhibit timing and power variations, making them more vulnerable.
-
Algorithmic Alignment: Barrel Shifters are well-suited for AES, which relies heavily on bitwise operations. MACs are less efficient for such operations unless multiplication is a primary function.
-
Design Flexibility: Barrel Shifters provide versatility for various bitwise operations, supporting multiple cryptographic algorithms, whereas MACs are more specialized.
In conclusion, Barrel Shifters are more suitable for Galois Field multiplication in AES due to their efficiency, timing advantages, and security benefits, making them a preferable choice for the given cryptographic coprocessor.